docs(session): complete investigation-only mode documentation by rjmurillo-bot · Pull Request #1215 · rjmurillo/ai-agents

rjmurillo-bot · 2026-02-20T09:19:26Z

Pull Request

Summary

Completes the remaining documentation for ADR-034 investigation session QA exemption (issue #651).

Specification References

Type	Reference	Description
Issue	Fixes #651	User Story: Documentation for investigation-only mode (Phase 2)
Spec	`.agents/architecture/ADR-034-investigation-session-qa-exemption.md`	Investigation session QA exemption ADR

Changes

Expanded memory-update session description in the "Valid investigation sessions" list with rationale for why memory-update sessions qualify as investigation work
Added a complete investigation-only session log JSON example to the Session Log Template section, showing the SKIPPED: investigation-only evidence pattern

Files Modified

.agents/SESSION-PROTOCOL.md

Type of Change

Documentation update

Testing

No testing required (documentation only)

Agent Review

Security Review

No security-critical changes in this PR

Other Agent Reviews

N/A (documentation-only change)

Checklist

Code follows project style guidelines
Self-review completed
Documentation updated (if applicable)
No new warnings introduced

Related Issues

Fixes #651

Generated with Claude Code

Add remaining documentation for ADR-034 investigation session QA exemption: - Expand memory-update session description with rationale - Add investigation-only session log JSON example with SKIPPED evidence Fixes #651 Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

chatgpt-codex-connector · 2026-02-20T09:19:31Z

Codex usage limits have been reached for code reviews. Please check with the admins of this repo to increase the limits by adding credits.
Credits must be used to enable repository wide code reviews.

gemini-code-assist · 2026-02-20T09:19:32Z

Note

Gemini is unable to generate a review for this pull request due to the file types involved not being currently supported.

github-actions · 2026-02-20T09:19:53Z

PR Validation Report

Caution

❌ Status: FAIL

Description Validation

Check	Status
Description matches diff	FAIL

QA Validation

Check	Status
Code changes detected	False
QA report exists	N/A

⚠️ Blocking Issues

PR description does not match actual changes

_{Powered by PR Validation workflow}

coderabbitai · 2026-02-20T09:37:31Z

Caution

Review failed

Failed to post review comments

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

Updated .agents/SESSION-PROTOCOL.md to document investigation-only sessions: clarified memory-update sessions as valid investigation work and added an "Investigation-Only Session Log Example" (full JSON) inside the Session Log Template. No executable code changed.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Investigation Session Documentation `.agents/SESSION-PROTOCOL.md`	Expanded "Valid investigation sessions" to explicitly include memory-update sessions; added an "Investigation-Only Session Log Example" with full JSON, notes, and key points specifying `SKIPPED: investigation-only` semantics; documentation-only edits, no code changes.

Sequence Diagram(s)

(omitted — changes are documentation-only and do not introduce new multi-component control flow)

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~8 minutes

Suggested reviewers

rjmurillo

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5

✅ Passed checks (5 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Title check	✅ Passed	Title follows conventional commit format (docs: topic) and clearly describes the documentation changes made.
Description check	✅ Passed	Description is directly related to the changeset, referencing issue `#651` and explaining the specific documentation additions made.
Linked Issues check	✅ Passed	Changes complete three of five acceptance criteria: SESSION-PROTOCOL.md updated with investigation-only pattern, memory-update sessions documented, and session log template example added [`#651`].
Out of Scope Changes check	✅ Passed	All changes are scoped to documentation updates for investigation-only mode as specified in `#651` with no unrelated modifications.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

Create PR with unit tests
Post copyable unit tests in a comment
Commit unit tests in branch feat/651-autonomous

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

github-actions · 2026-02-21T03:10:52Z

AI Quality Gate Review

Tip

✅ Final Verdict: PASS

Walkthrough

This PR was reviewed by six AI agents in parallel, analyzing different aspects of the changes:

Security Agent: Scans for vulnerabilities, secrets exposure, and security anti-patterns
QA Agent: Evaluates test coverage, error handling, and code quality
Analyst Agent: Assesses code quality, impact analysis, and maintainability
Architect Agent: Reviews design patterns, system boundaries, and architectural concerns
DevOps Agent: Evaluates CI/CD, build pipelines, and infrastructure changes
Roadmap Agent: Assesses strategic alignment, feature scope, and user value

Review Summary

Agent	Verdict	Category	Status
Security	PASS	N/A	✅
QA	PASS	N/A	✅
Analyst	PASS	N/A	✅
Architect	PASS	N/A	✅
DevOps	PASS	N/A	✅
Roadmap	PASS	N/A	✅

💡 Quick Access: Click on individual agent jobs (e.g., "🔒 security Review", "🧪 qa Review") in the workflow run to see detailed findings and step summaries.

Security Review Details

Security Review: PR #1215

PR Type Classification

File	Category	Security Scrutiny
`.agents/SESSION-PROTOCOL.md`	DOCS	None required

Classification: DOCS-only PR (documentation file outside .github/prompts/)

Analysis

Changes reviewed:

Line 504: Expanded description for memory-update sessions explaining why they qualify as investigation work
Lines 689-747: Added JSON example demonstrating investigation-only session log pattern

Findings

Severity	Category	Finding	Location	CWE
None	-	No security issues identified	-	-

Observations:

All values in the JSON example are placeholder data (session: 200, abc1234, def5678, feat/my-feature)
No real credentials, API keys, or tokens present
No sensitive internal URLs or endpoints disclosed
Content explains existing protocol behavior without introducing attack surface

Recommendations

None required.

Verdict

VERDICT: PASS
MESSAGE: Documentation-only change with no security implications. All JSON values are example placeholders.

QA Review Details

VERDICT: PASS
MESSAGE: Documentation-only PR with valid markdown syntax and no broken references.

PR TYPE: DOCS
FILES: .agents/SESSION-PROTOCOL.md (documentation)

EVIDENCE:
- Tests found: N/A - DOCS only
- Test execution: PASS (4351 passed, 3 skipped) - confirms no regressions from doc changes
- Edge cases: N/A - DOCS only
- Error handling: N/A - DOCS only
- Blocking issues: 0

ANALYSIS:

1. **Content Review**:
   - Line 504: Memory-update description expanded with clear rationale
   - Lines 689-747: Investigation-only session log example added with valid JSON structure
   - Example demonstrates correct `SKIPPED: investigation-only` evidence pattern per ADR-034

2. **Markdown Quality**:
   - Proper heading hierarchy (### Investigation-Only Session Log Example)
   - Code block correctly fenced with `json` language specifier
   - Bullet points properly formatted

3. **Cross-Reference Validation**:
   - References ADR-034 (exists at `.agents/architecture/ADR-034-investigation-session-qa-exemption.md`)
   - JSON example references schema at `.agents/schemas/session-log.schema.json` (valid path)

4. **Technical Accuracy**:
   - Example JSON follows session-log schema structure (schemaVersion, session, protocolCompliance, workLog)
   - `handoffNotUpdated` correctly shows `Complete: false` for MUST NOT requirement
   - Evidence patterns match documented conventions

REGRESSION RISK: Low
- Documentation-only change
- No executable code modified
- No API or behavior changes

Analyst Review Details

Now I have enough context to provide my analysis.

Analyst Review: PR #1215

Code Quality Score

Criterion	Score (1-5)	Notes
Readability	5	Clear explanation of memory-update rationale, well-structured JSON example
Maintainability	5	Documentation follows existing patterns, easy to update
Consistency	5	Matches existing session log format and ADR-034 terminology
Simplicity	4	JSON example is comprehensive but slightly verbose (60 lines)

Overall: 4.75/5

Impact Assessment

Scope: Isolated (single documentation file)
Risk Level: Low
Affected Components: .agents/SESSION-PROTOCOL.md only

Findings

Priority	Category	Finding	Location
Low	Completeness	JSON example includes all required fields per schema	Lines 693-740
Low	Accuracy	`handoffNotUpdated` uses `Complete: false` correctly for MUST NOT items	Line 718
Low	Alignment	Example aligns with ADR-034 Phase 2 documentation requirements	ADR-034:242-253

Verification Checks

Schema Compliance: JSON example includes schemaVersion, session, protocolCompliance, workLog fields matching .agents/schemas/session-log.schema.json
ADR-034 Alignment: Documentation satisfies Phase 2 requirements:
- Memory-update sessions documented as valid investigation sessions [PASS]
- Session log template updated with investigation-only example [PASS]
Existing Pattern Consistency: SKIPPED: investigation-only evidence matches SKIPPED: docs-only pattern

Recommendations

None required. Changes are complete and accurate.

Verdict

VERDICT: PASS
MESSAGE: Documentation completes ADR-034 Phase 2 requirements with accurate session log example and clear memory-update rationale.

Architect Review Details

Design Quality Assessment

Aspect	Rating (1-5)	Notes
Pattern Adherence	5	Follows ADR-034 implementation plan exactly (Phase 2 items 3 and 4)
Boundary Respect	5	Changes scoped to SESSION-PROTOCOL.md documentation only
Coupling	5	No code dependencies introduced
Cohesion	5	Single responsibility: document investigation-only mode
Extensibility	5	Example is self-contained and illustrative

Overall Design Score: 5/5

Architectural Concerns

Severity	Concern	Location	Recommendation
None	-	-	-

No architectural concerns identified. Changes are documentation-only.

Breaking Change Assessment

Breaking Changes: No
Impact Scope: None
Migration Required: No
Migration Path: N/A

Technical Debt Analysis

Debt Added: None
Debt Reduced: Low (improved documentation reduces future confusion)
Net Impact: Improved

ADR Assessment

ADR Required: No
Decisions Identified: None (implements existing ADR-034 Phase 2 documentation)
Existing ADR: ADR-034-investigation-session-qa-exemption.md
Recommendation: N/A (PR fulfills ADR-034 Phase 2 documentation requirements)

Recommendations

None. The PR correctly implements the remaining Phase 2 documentation items from ADR-034.

Verdict

VERDICT: PASS
MESSAGE: Documentation-only change that completes ADR-034 Phase 2 requirements. Expanded memory-update rationale aligns with allowlist justification. JSON example follows established session log schema with correct SKIPPED pattern.

DevOps Review Details

Pipeline Impact Assessment

Area	Impact	Notes
Build	None	Documentation-only change
Test	None	No code modified
Deploy	None	No deployment changes
Cost	None	No CI/CD changes

CI/CD Quality Checks

Check	Status	Location
YAML syntax valid	N/A	No workflow files changed
Actions pinned	N/A	No actions modified
Secrets secure	N/A	No secrets involved
Permissions minimal	N/A	No permissions changed
Shell scripts robust	N/A	No scripts modified

Findings

Severity	Category	Finding	Location	Fix
-	-	No DevOps concerns	-	-

Template Assessment

PR Template: Adequate
Issue Templates: N/A (not modified)
Template Issues: None

Automation Opportunities

Opportunity	Type	Benefit	Effort
-	-	-	-

Recommendations

None. This is a documentation-only PR updating .agents/SESSION-PROTOCOL.md with expanded explanations and a JSON example for investigation-only sessions. No CI/CD, build, or infrastructure components are affected.

Verdict

VERDICT: PASS
MESSAGE: Documentation-only PR with no DevOps impact. Changes expand session protocol documentation with memory-update rationale and investigation-only session log example.

Roadmap Review Details

Strategic Alignment Assessment

Criterion	Rating	Notes
Aligns with project goals	High	Completes Phase 2 documentation from accepted ADR-034
Priority appropriate	High	P0 documentation specified in ADR implementation plan
User value clear	High	Enables agents to use investigation-only mode correctly
Investment justified	High	Minimal effort (22 lines added) to complete existing feature

Feature Completeness

Scope Assessment: Right-sized
Ship Ready: Yes
MVP Complete: Yes (addresses both items from ADR-034 Phase 2: expanded description + JSON example)
Enhancement Opportunities: None identified. Documentation is complete.

Impact Analysis

Dimension	Assessment	Notes
User Value	High	Agents blocked on using investigation-only mode now have clear guidance
Business Impact	Medium	Reduces 29.4% session workaround friction (per ADR-034 analysis)
Technical Leverage	Low	Documentation only, no code
Competitive Position	Neutral	Internal process improvement

Concerns

Priority	Concern	Recommendation
Low	JSON example uses year 2026	Cosmetic, acceptable for example data

Recommendations

Merge as-is. This PR completes the Phase 2 documentation deliverables specified in ADR-034 lines 242-253.

Verdict

VERDICT: PASS
MESSAGE: PR completes P0 documentation from ADR-034 Phase 2. Scope is right-sized. Both deliverables (memory-update rationale, JSON example) addressed. No strategic concerns.

Run Details

Property	Value
Run ID	22421164856
Triggered by	`pull_request` on `1215/merge`
Commit	`53b42d2a575824a70224daea1565c1776667fdf9`

_{Powered by AI Quality Gate workflow}

rjmurillo · 2026-02-21T06:33:26Z

Re-triggering CI after description fix

rjmurillo · 2026-02-25T23:46:35Z

Retriggering CI

rjmurillo · 2026-02-27T06:23:18Z

Review Triage Required

Note

Priority: NORMAL - Human approval required before bot responds

Review Summary

Source	Reviews	Comments
Human	1	0
Bot	0	0

Next Steps

Review human feedback above
Address any CHANGES_REQUESTED from human reviewers
Add triage:approved label when ready for bot to respond to review comments

_{Powered by PR Maintenance workflow - Add triage:approved label}

rjmurillo-bot self-assigned this Feb 20, 2026

rjmurillo-bot enabled auto-merge (squash) February 20, 2026 09:19

github-actions bot added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 20, 2026

coderabbitai bot requested a review from rjmurillo February 20, 2026 09:20

coderabbitai bot added agent-memory Context persistence agent agent-qa Testing and verification agent area-workflows GitHub Actions workflows documentation Improvements or additions to documentation labels Feb 20, 2026

github-actions bot added the infrastructure-failure CI infrastructure failure (Copilot CLI auth, rate limits, etc.) label Feb 21, 2026

rjmurillo closed this Feb 21, 2026

auto-merge was automatically disabled February 21, 2026 06:12
Pull request was closed

rjmurillo reopened this Feb 21, 2026

rjmurillo closed this Feb 21, 2026

rjmurillo reopened this Feb 21, 2026

rjmurillo enabled auto-merge (squash) February 21, 2026 06:39

rjmurillo approved these changes Feb 25, 2026

View reviewed changes

rjmurillo closed this Feb 25, 2026

auto-merge was automatically disabled February 25, 2026 23:46
Pull request was closed

rjmurillo reopened this Feb 25, 2026

rjmurillo enabled auto-merge (squash) February 25, 2026 23:46

Uh oh!

Conversation

rjmurillo-bot commented Feb 20, 2026 • edited by rjmurillo Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Pull Request

Summary

Specification References

Changes

Files Modified

Type of Change

Testing

Agent Review

Security Review

Other Agent Reviews

Checklist

Related Issues

Uh oh!

chatgpt-codex-connector bot commented Feb 20, 2026

Uh oh!

gemini-code-assist bot commented Feb 20, 2026

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Feb 20, 2026

PR Validation Report

Description Validation

QA Validation

⚠️ Blocking Issues

Uh oh!

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 20, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Review failed

Walkthrough

Changes

Sequence Diagram(s)

Estimated code review effort

Suggested reviewers

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Feb 21, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

AI Quality Gate Review

Review Summary

Security Review: PR #1215

PR Type Classification

Analysis

Findings

Recommendations

Verdict

Analyst Review: PR #1215

Code Quality Score

Impact Assessment

Findings

Verification Checks

Recommendations

Verdict

Design Quality Assessment

Architectural Concerns

Breaking Change Assessment

Technical Debt Analysis

ADR Assessment

Recommendations

Verdict

Pipeline Impact Assessment

CI/CD Quality Checks

Findings

Template Assessment

Automation Opportunities

Recommendations

Verdict

Strategic Alignment Assessment

Feature Completeness

Impact Analysis

Concerns

Recommendations

Verdict

Uh oh!

rjmurillo commented Feb 21, 2026

Uh oh!

rjmurillo commented Feb 25, 2026

Uh oh!

rjmurillo commented Feb 27, 2026

Review Triage Required

rjmurillo-bot commented Feb 20, 2026 •

edited by rjmurillo

Loading

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 20, 2026 •

edited

Loading

github-actions bot commented Feb 21, 2026 •

edited

Loading